The Effect of the Time of Favipiravir Initiation on Clinical Course and Mortality among COVID-19 Patients in the Intensive Care Unit

Favipiravir Timing and Clinical Outcomes in COVID-19

Authors

  • Halil Erkan Sayan Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Bursa Yuksek Ihtisas Training and Research Hospital, University of Health Sciences, Bursa, Türkiye. https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3943-5549
  • Korgün Ökmen Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Bursa Yuksek Ihtisas Training and Research Hospital, University of Health Sciences, Bursa, Türkiye. https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8546-4661
  • İlkay Ceylan Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Bursa Yuksek Ihtisas Training and Research Hospital, University of Health Sciences, Bursa, Türkiye. https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3306-3107

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.71350/ajaic.15

Keywords:

COVID-19, Favipiravir, Intensive care unit, Antiviral therapy, Mortality

Abstract

Background: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) may lead to severe viral pneumonia and acute respiratory failure requiring intensive care unit (ICU) admission. During the early phase of the pandemic, favipiravir was widely used as an antiviral agent; however, evidence regarding the optimal timing of its initiation in critically ill patients has remained limited. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of favipiravir initiation timing on clinical outcomes and mortality in ICU patients with COVID-19.

Material and Methods: This retrospective cohort study included adult patients (≥18 years) with laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 who were admitted to the ICU between April 1 and June 1, 2020. Patients were divided into two groups according to the timing of favipiravir initiation: Group I, favipiravir initiated at ICU admission; and Group II, favipiravir initiated prior to ICU admission and continued during the ICU stay. Demographic characteristics, comorbidities, clinical outcomes, laboratory parameters, and treatment-related data were obtained from electronic medical records and ICU follow-up charts. The primary outcomes were ICU length of stay and mortality. Secondary outcomes included respiratory support requirements and corticosteroid use.

Results: A total of 158 patients were analyzed (Group I, n=76; Group II, n=82). Baseline demographic and clinical characteristics were comparable between the groups. The ICU length of stay was significantly shorter in Group II compared with Group I (6.57 ± 5 vs. 10.91 ± 8.54 days, p=0.001). Corticosteroid therapy was required more frequently in Group I than in Group II (36.8% vs. 15.8%, p=0.003). Rates of intubation, noninvasive mechanical ventilation, high-flow nasal cannula use, and tocilizumab therapy did not differ significantly between the groups. Mortality was numerically lower in Group II, but this difference was not statistically significant (46% vs. 56.6%, p=0.148). Laboratory parameters, including d-dimer, ferritin, and C-reactive protein, were similar between the groups.     

Conclusion: Earlier initiation of favipiravir prior to ICU admission was associated with a shorter ICU stay and reduced corticosteroid requirement but did not significantly affect mortality. These findings suggest that early antiviral therapy may modestly influence clinical progression in critically ill COVID-19 patients without altering overall survival.

References

1. Huang C, Wang Y, Li X, et al. Clinical features of patients infected with 2019 novel coronavirus in Wuhan, China [published correction appears in Lancet. 2020 Jan 30]. Lancet. 2020;395(10223):497-506, https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30183-5.

2. Chen N, Zhou M, Dong X, et al. Epidemiological and clinical characteristics of 99 cases of 2019 novel coronavirus pneumonia in Wuhan, China: a descriptive study. Lancet. 2020;395(10223):507-513, https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30211-7.

3. Wang D, Hu B, Hu C, et al. Clinical Characteristics of 138 Hospitalized Patients With 2019 Novel Coronavirus-Infected Pneumonia in Wuhan, China. JAMA. 2020;323(11):1061-1069, https://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jama.2020.1585.

4. Cai Q, Yang M, Liu D, et al. Experimental treatment with favipiravir for COVID-19: an open-label control study. Engineering 2020. S2095809920300631, https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eng.2020.03.007.

5. Sun P, Qie S, Liu Z, et al. Clinical characteristics of hospitalized patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection: A single arm meta-analysis. J Med Virol. 2020;92(6):612-617, https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jmv.25735.

6. Uyeki TM, Bernstein HH, Bradley JS, et al. Clinical Practice Guidelines by the Infectious Diseases Society of America: 2018 Update on Diagnosis, Treatment, Chemoprophylaxis, and Institutional Outbreak Management of Seasonal Influenzaa [published correction appears in Clin Infect Dis. 2019 May 2;68(10):1790]. Clin Infect Dis. 2019;68(6):e1-e47, https://dx.doi.org/ 10.1093/cid/ciy866.

7. Chan KS, Lai ST, Chu CM, et al. Treatment of severe acute respiratory syndrome with lopinavir/ritonavir: a multicentre retrospective matched cohort study. Hong Kong Med J. 2003;9(6):399-406.

8. Delang L, Abdelnabi R, Neyts J. Favipiravir as a potential countermeasure against neglected and emerging RNA viruses. Antiviral Res. 2018;153:85–94, https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.antiviral.2018.03.003.

9. Furuta Y, Komeno T,Nakamura T. Favipiravir (T‐705), a broad spectrum inhibitor of viral RNA polymerase. Proc Jpn Acad Ser B Phys Biol Sci. 2017;93(7):449-463, https://dx.doi.org/10.2183/pjab.93.027.

10. Irie K, Nakagawa A, Fujita H, et al. Pharmacokinetics of Favipiravir in Critically Ill Patients With COVID-19. Clin Transl Sci. 2020;13(5):880-885, https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cts.12827.

11. To KK, Tsang OT, Leung WS, et al. Temporal profiles of viral load in posterior oropharyngeal saliva samples and serum antibody responses during infection by SARS-CoV2: an observational cohort study. Lancet Infect Dis. 2020;20(5):565-574, https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1473-3099(20)30196-1.

12. Republic of Turkey Ministry of Health. COVID-19 (SARS-CoV2 infection) treatment of adult patients in 2020. (Updated 12 October 2020. Accessed 15 October 2020.) Available from: https://covid19.saglik.gov.tr/Eklenti/39061/0/ covid-19rehberieriskinhastatedavisipdf.pdf

13. Du YX, Chen XP. Favipiravir: pharmacokinetics and concerns about clinical trials for 2019-nCoV infection. Du YX, Chen XP. Favipiravir: Pharmacokinetics and Concerns About Clinical Trials for 2019-nCoV Infection. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2020;108(2):242-247, https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cpt.1844.

14. Sissoko D, Laouenan C, Folkesson E, et al. Correction: Experimental Treatment with Favipiravir for Ebola Virus Disease (the JIKI Trial): A Historically Controlled, Single-Arm Proof-of-Concept Trial in Guinea. PLoS Med. 2016;13(4):e1002009. Published 2016 Apr 5, https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1002009.

15. Chen C, Huang J, Cheng Z, et al. Favipiravir versus arbidol for COVID-19: a randomized clinical trial. MedRxiv. 2020, https://dx.doi.org/10.1101/2020.03.17.20037432.

16. Wang M, Cao R, Zhang L, et al. Remdesivir and chloroquine effectively inhibit the recently emerged novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) in vitro. Cell Res. 2020;30(3):269-271, https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41422-020-0282-0.

17. Ivashchenko AA, Dmitriev KA, Vostokova NV, et al. AVIFAVIR for Treatment of Patients with Moderate COVID-19: Interim Results of a Phase II/III Multicenter Randomized Clinical Trial [published online ahead of print, 2020 Aug 9]. Clin Infect Dis. 2020;ciaa1176, https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciaa1176.

18. Yamamura H, Matsuura H, Nakagawa J, Fukuoka H, Domi H, Chujoh S. Effect of favipiravir and an anti-inflammatory strategy for COVID-19. Crit Care. 2020;24(1):413, https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13054-020-03137-5.

19. Gönen C, Baltacı Özen S, Kayar Çalılı D, Erdem D, Özkocak Turan I. Retrospective Evaluation of COVID-19 Patients Receiving Low-Dose Dexamethasone Therapy in the Intensive Care Unit.: Low-Dose Dexamethasone in COVID-19. Anatolian Journal of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care [Internet]. 2025 Sep. 30 [cited 2026 Jan. 2];1(1):1-8. Available from: https://ajaic.com/index.php/pub/article/view/4

20. Kilicarslan N, Gurbuz H, Eminoglu S, Arslan SE, Karasu D, Ozyaprak B, et.al. Comparison of Code Blue Practices Between the First Year of COVID-19 and the Previous Year. Med Bull Haseki 2022;60:211-219.

Downloads

Published

31-01-2026

How to Cite

Sayan, H. E., Ökmen, K., & Ceylan, İlkay. (2026). The Effect of the Time of Favipiravir Initiation on Clinical Course and Mortality among COVID-19 Patients in the Intensive Care Unit: Favipiravir Timing and Clinical Outcomes in COVID-19. The Anatolian Journal of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, 2(1), 13–20. https://doi.org/10.71350/ajaic.15

Issue

Section

Articles