The Role of Previous Spinal Anesthesia Experience in Anesthesia Preference for Cesarean Section

Spinal Anesthesia Experience and Anesthesia Preference

Authors

  • İrem Aksoy Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Health Sciences University Bursa Yuksek Ihtisas Training and Research Hospital, Bursa, TURKEY
  • Nermin Kılıçarslan Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Health Sciences University Bursa Yuksek Ihtisas Training and Research Hospital, Bursa, TURKEY https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5855-9099

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.71350/ajaic.13

Keywords:

Anesthesia experience, Adverse effects, Cesarean section, Patient preference, Regional anesthesia

Abstract

Background: The choice of anesthesia in cesarean delivery is a crucial decision that affects maternal and neonatal outcomes. Beyond clinical indications, variables such as previous anesthetic experience, patient health literacy level, preoperative anxiety state, and the risk of adverse perioperative outcomes may significantly shape patient preferences. This study was designed to assess the impact of these factors on anesthetic modality selection among women scheduled for elective cesarean delivery.

Material and Methods: This single-center, cross-sectional survey included forty pregnant women within the eligible age range of 18–45 years who provided informed consent, all of whom had at least one previous spinal anesthesia experience. Data were collected using a structured questionnaire addressing demographic characteristics, prior anesthesia experiences, adverse effects, preoperative anxiety, and determinants of current preference. Statistical analyses employed chi-square and Fisher’s exact tests, odds ratios, and effect size measures.

Results: Spinal anesthesia was chosen by 80% of participants, while 20% preferred general anesthesia. A strong association was found between prior spinal anesthesia experience and current preference (p=0.003, Cramer’s V=0.517). Positive experiences strongly predicted repeated spinal preference (96%), whereas negative experiences were equally divided between spinal and general anesthesia. Adequate knowledge of spinal anesthesia was significantly associated with preference (p=0.043). Adverse effects were reported by 52.5% of patients, most commonly back pain (25%), nausea (20%), and vomiting (12.5%). Back pain (p=0.015), vomiting (p=0.003), and intraoperative pain (p=0.04) were significantly linked to avoidance of spinal anesthesia. Patients without prior side effects were nine times more likely to choose spinal anesthesia (OR=9.00; 95% CI: 0.989–81.9). Preoperative anxiety levels were also significantly associated with preference (p=0.006); severe anxiety increased general anesthesia preference, while low-to-moderate anxiety favored spinal anesthesia. Physician recommendation, pain control, and rapid postoperative recovery were rated as the most influential determinants.

Conclusion: Previous experiences, knowledge, adverse effects, and psychological state significantly influence anesthesia preferences in cesarean patients. Structured preoperative education, effective pain management, and strategies to minimize preventable side effects may enhance spinal anesthesia acceptance and improve maternal satisfaction.

References

Liu S, Liston RM, Joseph KS, Heaman M, Sauve R, Kramer MS. Maternal mortality and severe morbidity associated with low-risk planned cesarean delivery versus planned vaginal delivery at term. Can Med Assoc J. 2007 Feb 13;176(4):455–60.

Gwanzura C, Gavi S, Mangiza M, Moyo FV, Lohman MC, Nhemachena T, et al. Effect of anesthesia administration method on apgar scores of infants born to women undergoing elective cesarean section. BMC Anesthesiol. 2023 Apr 27;23(1):142.

Sami Ullah Khan, Chanda Naseem, Muhammad Tayyeb, Israr Hussain, Abdul Aziz, Omama Shahid. Assessing Maternal Satisfaction and Neonatal outcomes in Patients Scheduled for Elective Caesarean Section under Spinal Anaesthesia at Shah Medical Center Swat. Indus Journal of Bioscience Research. 2025 Jan 31;3(1):589–95.

Idris IM, Weldegiorgis GG, Tesfamariam EH. Maternal Satisfaction and Its Associated Factors towards Spinal Anesthesia for Caesarean Section: A Cross-Sectional Study in Two Eritrean Hospitals. Anesthesiol Res Pract. 2020 Mar 21;2020:1–8.

Karataş SŞ, Bulut OK, Öner SF. The effect of different information methods on patients’ anxiety and preference for spinal versus general anesthesia in a Turkish cohort of women scheduled for cesarean delivery: a prospective observational study. Int J Obstet Anesth. 2025 Aug;63:104689.

Sadeghi M, Bayat R, Azimaraghi O, Saliminia A. Maternal Satisfaction of Spinal Anesthesia for Elective Cesarean Section in an Academic Hospital. Annals of Anesthesiology and Critical Care. 2017 Jun 30;2(2).

Rhee WJ, Chung CJ, Lim YH, Lee KH, Lee SC. Factors in patient dissatisfaction and refusal regarding spinal anesthesia. Korean J Anesthesiol. 2010;59(4):260.

Arslan B, Ozturk N, Onuk Z, Karsli B. Factors affecting selection of anesthesia type in elective cesarean operations and pregnant preferences for anesthesia outcome. Medicine Science | International Medical Journal. 2018;(0):1.

Carvalho B, Cohen SE, Lipman SS, Fuller A, Mathusamy AD, Macario A. Patient Preferences for Anesthesia Outcomes Associated with Cesarean Delivery. Anesth Analg. 2005 Oct;101(4):1182–7.

Tawfeeq NA, Hilal F, Alharbi NM, Alowid F, Almaghrabi RY, Alsubhi R, et al. The Prevalence of Acceptance Between General Anesthesia and Spinal Anesthesia Among Pregnant Women Undergoing Elective Caesarean Sections in Saudi Arabia. Cureus. 2023 Sep

Lim G, Facco FL, Nathan N, Waters JH, Wong CA, Eltzschig HK. A Review of the Impact of Obstetric Anesthesia on Maternal and Neonatal Outcomes. Anesthesiology. 2018 Jul;129(1):192–215.

Downloads

Published

30-09-2025

How to Cite

Aksoy, İrem, & Kılıçarslan, N. (2025). The Role of Previous Spinal Anesthesia Experience in Anesthesia Preference for Cesarean Section: Spinal Anesthesia Experience and Anesthesia Preference. The Anatolian Journal of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, 1(1), 24–30. https://doi.org/10.71350/ajaic.13

Issue

Section

Articles