Assessment of Information Quality of Instagram Posts Related With Intensive Care
Information Quality of Intensive Care Posts on Instagram
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.71350/ajaic.11Keywords:
Intensive care, Instagram, Information quality, Social media, DISCERNAbstract
Background: Social media has become a prominent source of health information, yet the accuracy and reliability of content remain uncertain. Instagram, as a visually driven platform, is increasingly used for disseminating medical knowledge. This study aimed to assess the quality and reliability of Instagram posts related to intensive care, focusing on four commonly used hashtags: #entübasyon, #mekanikventilasyon, #sepsis, and #yoğunbakım.
Material and Methods: A cross-sectional design was employed. On August 1, 2025, 200 posts were collected for each hashtag (#entübasyon, #mekanikventilasyon, #sepsis, and #yoğunbakım), yielding a total of 800 posts. Each post was analyzed as informative, non-medical, or advertisement-based. To evaluate informational quality and scientific reliability, the Modified DISCERN tool was applied by intensive care specialists. Mean scores were compared between posts shared by healthcare professionals and non-professionals using an independent samples t-test, with p < 0.05 considered statistically significant.
Results: Of 800 posts screened, 79 (9.9%) were excluded. Among the 721 analyzed posts, 472 (65.5%) were informative, 202 (28.0%) non-medical, and 47 (6.5%) advertisement-based. Informative content predominated under #entübasyon (95.1%) and #sepsis (92.9%), while #mekanikventilasyon (31.9%) and #yoğunbakım (35.4%) showed markedly lower proportions. Notably, advertisement content was observed exclusively in the #mekanikventilasyon group (25.8%). The mean Modified DISCERN score was 3.17 ± 1.23 for posts shared by healthcare professionals and 3.05 ± 1.18 for those by non-professionals, with no significant difference (p > 0.05).
Conclusion: Instagram posts under intensive care–related hashtags often lack reliable scientific information, particularly within #mekanikventilasyon and #yoğunbakım. The presence of substantial non-medical and commercial content raises concerns regarding public access to trustworthy information. Expanding the contribution of healthcare professionals with evidence-based content may help mitigate misinformation and enhance public understanding of critical care.
References
Hasham MA, Parshuram V, Bandre GR. Social media in healthcare: Transforming patient engagement, education, and research dissemination. Int J Acad Med. 2025 Jan;11(1):4–9.
Social media - Wikipedia [Internet]. [cited 2025 Aug 24]. Available from: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_media
Charnock D, Shepperd S, Needham G, Gann R. DISCERN: an instrument for judging the quality of written consumer health information on treatment choices. J Epidemiol Community Health (1978). 1999 Feb 1;53(2):105–11.
Kocyigit BF, Nacitarhan V, Koca TT, Berk E. YouTube as a source of patient information for ankylosing spondylitis exercises. Clin Rheumatol. 2019 Jun 15;38(6):1747–51.
Gurler D, Buyukceran I. Assessment of the Medical Reliability of Videos on Social Media: Detailed Analysis of the Quality and Usability of Four Social Media Platforms (Facebook, Instagram, Twitter, and YouTube). Healthcare. 2022 Sep 22;10(10):1836.
Sahin E, Seyyar M. Assessing the scientific quality and reliability of YouTube videos about chemotherapy. Medicine. 2023 Nov 10;102(45):e35916.
Madathil KC, Rivera-Rodriguez AJ, Greenstein JS, Gramopadhye AK. Healthcare information on YouTube: A systematic review. Health Informatics J. 2015 Sep 25;21(3):173–94.
Chen J, Wang Y. Social Media Use for Health Purposes: Systematic Review. J Med Internet Res. 2021 May 12;23(5):e17917.
Silberg WM, Lundberg GD, Musacchio RA. Assessing, controlling, and assuring the quality of medical information on the Internet: Caveant lector et viewor--Let the reader and viewer beware. JAMA. 1997 Apr 16;277(15):1244–5.
Denniss E, Lindberg R, McNaughton SA. Development of Principles for Health-Related Information on Social Media: Delphi Study. J Med Internet Res. 2022 Sep 8;24(9):e37337.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Gürcan Güler, Yılmaz Apaydın, Tuğçe Mert, Ahmet Karaosman

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.